Hi, often I get the feeling that Atheists are expected to be experts on religion & religious texts in order to give them the 'tools' necessary to refute creationism & associated beliefs.
It's almost like, if you admit you're an Atheist, you'd better have a damn good argument to back yourself up. I get this impression from both religious people as well as other Atheists telling me "It's not OK to be an ignorant Atheist." - Specifically in respect to religion.
I'd like to ask why it isn't ok for me to simply say "No I don't want or need exposure to your religion." & "No I don't need to prove God doesn't exist." Without getting into a drawn out discussion about what is written in some ancient text, or have to explain why I don't want to fill a gap in my understanding of some (currently) unexplained natural phenomenon with 'Proof of God.'
Well I think it is OK to be an ignorant Atheist.
Because honestly, there are only so many hours in a day, and I'd rather be filling my head with better understanding of (insert interests/hobbies here) rather than having to read up on the Koran simply to be able to defend my Atheist standpoint.
I understand that having an understanding of religions is useful for us to better understand our history and the origins of our cultures & languages, but for me, knowing that religion exists is more than enough!
What are your thoughts?